<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NVCC &#187; east lane trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nvcc.org.uk/tag/east-lane-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nvcc.org.uk</link>
	<description>National Voice of Coastal Communities: giving coastal issues a voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Environment Agency: &#8220;Alternative funding sources needed for future flood defences&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nvcc.org.uk/2010/07/alternative-funding-sources-needed-for-future-flood-defences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nvcc.org.uk/2010/07/alternative-funding-sources-needed-for-future-flood-defences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaydublu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bawdsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east lane trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nvcc.org.uk/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Future investment in flood defences will require greater contributions from communities and businesses, Environment Agency Chief Executive Dr Paul Leinster will say in a speech today. Speaking at the Defra/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Risk Management conference in Telford, Dr Leinster will say that local contributions to the funding of flood defences will have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Future  investment in flood defences will require greater contributions from  communities and businesses, Environment Agency Chief Executive Dr Paul  Leinster will say in a speech today.</p>
<p>Speaking at the  Defra/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Risk Management conference in  Telford, Dr Leinster will say that local contributions to the funding  of flood defences will have to play a greater role in reducing the risk  of flood and coastal erosion. His comments echo calls made by Sir  Michael Pitt in his independent review of the summer 2007 floods.</p>
<p>Environment Agency spending on flood and coastal risk management is  currently at record levels (£629m for 2010-11). However, other sources  of funding will need to be found to protect communities from increasing  risk of flooding and coastal erosion including from changes in climate  in future.<span id="more-1069"></span></p>
<p>Some communities have already adopted this approach and, with the  assistance of the Environment Agency and Defra, increased levels of  protection against flooding and coastal erosion. These include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hereford (Midlands region): Asda contributed £2m as part of the  planning conditions for a supermarket in the town, in addition to  constructing 440m of flood defence. The total cost of the scheme was  £7.5m and it provides protection to 196 properties including 25 listed  buildings.</li>
<li>East Hanney (Thames region): Volunteers cleared weeds from a local  brook, increasing the brook’s capacity, and also constructed a flood  defence bank and footpath. The Environment Agency provided soil, the  hire of two mini-excavators and two dump trucks. The local authority  paid for coir rolls used to help stabilise the new bank.</li>
<li>Bawdsey (Anglian region): In 2007 a group of local landowners and  residents formed the East Lane Trust to raise £2.2m to implement a  coastal protection and flood defence scheme for a 250m section of coast.  The money was raised by selling plots of land in nearby villages. In  2007, the government granted special permission to allow 26 homes to be  built on the plots which were not previously available for residential  development. The money raised was given to the District Council to  commission a sustainable coast protection scheme which was completed in  summer 2009.</li>
</ul>
<p>Dr Paul Leinster said:</p>
<p>“The Environment Agency has been given £629m by Defra to reduce flood  and coastal risk this year, £21m more than last year. We are on track  to reduce flood risk to 160,000 properties in England between April 2008  and March 2011 – exceeding our Government target for the period by  15,000.</p>
<p>“Whilst continued government investment in managing the risk of  flooding is important, we must now also look at alternative funding  streams, including increased contributions from those who will benefit  from future defence schemes.”</p>
<h3>Examples of Alternative Sources of Funding</h3>
<h4>Community self-help</h4>
<p><strong>Appleby:</strong><br />
This scheme (and another in Sandside,  South Lakeland) was jointly conceived and administrated by the  Environment Agency and Eden District Council (South Lakeland District  council for Sandside).<br />
It formed part of the national Defra £500k  Pilot Flood Resilience project where local authorities and the  Environment Agency were encouraged to work together in different ways to  promote a resilience scheme. £90k and £80k of grant money was received  by Eden and South Lakeland Councils respectively, directly from Defra.  This arrangement meant that the Councils could use their grant  distribution powers to fund individual property protection schemes.<br />
The  level of grant was apportioned on property threshold level and a higher  amount of grant was available to residential properties than  commercial.<br />
The average amount of grant issued to the 46 properties  that took part was approximately £1300. The property owners were  expected to fund any work in excess of the grant available for their  particular property. It was noticeable that this level of private excess  funding was greater in the relatively more affluent location of  Sandside.<br />
Approximately 26 of the properties that took part in the  Appleby scheme benefited from their defences in the November 2009  flooding. They would have flooded if their resilience scheme funded  defences had not been in place.</p>
<h4>Local contributions</h4>
<p><strong>East Lane, Bawdsey Coastal Protection</strong><br />
In 1997 a  major storm led to the already vulnerable coastline at East Lane,  Bawdsey in Suffolk to erode severely. This retreating coastline posed an  immediate threat to three coastal properties, including a Grade I  listed Martello Tower. Due to insufficient priority, Suffolk Coastal  District Council struggled to justify grant aid to fund a complete  scheme at East Lane. This led to a series of emergency works along the  District Council and Environment Agency frontages to limit the damage  caused primarily from winter storms.</p>
<p>In 2007 a group of local landowners and residents formed East Lane  Trust, a “not-for-profit” charitable organisation to raise £2.2m to  implement a coastal protection and flood defence scheme for the 250m  section of coast. The money was raised by selling plots of land in  nearby villages. In 2007, the government granted special permission to  allow 26 homes to be built on the plots which were not in the Local Plan  as being available for residential development. The money raised was  given to the District Council to commission a sustainable coast  protection scheme which was completed in summer 2009. It is thought to  be the first privately funded coastal protection scheme since the  enactment of the Coast Protection Act in 1949. The scheme highlights  that, through effective co-operation between local communities and the  responsible authorities, common goals can be achieved.</p>
<h4>Additional examples:</h4>
<p><strong>Leeds City Flood Alleviation</strong><br />
The project will  increase the level of protection to Leeds City centre but makes a  relatively low contribution to reducing flood risk for households.  However, the proposed project is likely to enable significant economic  and financial benefits for the local and regional business, commercial  and development/regeneration sectors. In line with our FCRM External  Contributions policy, these benefits are sufficient to justify a  contribution of at least £50m towards the £178m scheme’s total cost.  Discussions, consultations and negotiations are on-going between the  Environment Agency and the City Council on how this value of  contribution can be realised to secure the proposed benefits to the  city.</p></blockquote>
<p>Press Release on the <a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/news/121034.aspx" target="_blank">Environment Agency website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nvcc.org.uk/2010/07/alternative-funding-sources-needed-for-future-flood-defences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EADT: &#8220;New sea defences to protect coastline&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nvcc.org.uk/2009/06/eadt-new-sea-defences-to-protect-coastline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nvcc.org.uk/2009/06/eadt-new-sea-defences-to-protect-coastline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaydublu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suffolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bawdsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east lane trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martello tower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nvcc.org.uk/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AN innovative scheme to save a vulnerable stretch of coastline from the ravages of the sea is now complete &#8211; and just in the nick of time if this latest photograph is anything to go by. Work to protect the cliffs, Martello Tower and two homes in East Lane, Bawdsey, near Woodbridge, has finally finished [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.nvcc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bawdsey.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-539" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="The new sea defences at East Lane, in Bawdsey. Photo: MIKE PAGE" src="http://www.nvcc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bawdsey-300x150.jpg" alt="The new sea defences at East Lane, in Bawdsey. Photo: MIKE PAGE" width="300" height="150" /></a>AN innovative scheme to save a vulnerable stretch of coastline from the ravages of the sea is now complete &#8211; and just in the nick of time if this latest photograph is anything to go by.</p>
<p>Work to protect the cliffs, Martello Tower and two homes in East Lane, Bawdsey, near Woodbridge, has finally finished following years of uncertainty.</p>
<p>Campaigners feared the coastline would be swept away and large areas of low lying farmland would be flooded if nothing was done.</p>
<p>But the defence scheme was low on a list of national priorities and the Government said it could not pay for any work.</p>
<p>As result the East Lane Trust (ELT) was formed and the group came up with a ground breaking community project to raise the vital funds.<span id="more-537"></span></p>
<p>Suffolk Coastal District Council granted permission for 26 new homes to be built on land at Bawdsey, Alderton and Hollesley and those sites were then marketed to potential developers.</p>
<p>The money generated through their sale was used by the local authority &#8211; which had to break planning policy to allow houses on land normally safeguarded for development &#8211; to pay for the improvements.</p>
<p>The land at Bawdsey and Alderton has been sold and negotiations are still underway for the site at Hollesley.</p>
<p>But the project &#8211; which has cost in the region of £2.4million &#8211; is now complete, much to the delight of all those involved.</p>
<p>Gerry Matthews, developer of the East Lane Trust initiative, said: “I&#8217;m very pleased. I think the Martello Tower and one of the cottages would have to have been demolished so it&#8217;s very timely.</p>
<p>“It is the culmination of a lot of hard work and effort. The reality of the situation united the three parishes. We all worked hard to produce a local answer to the funding gap.”</p>
<p>John Fell-Clark, owner of the Martello Tower, said: “I&#8217;ve spent 12 years campaigning &#8211; it&#8217;s a great moment. Its terrific news and a culmination of a tremendous effort by everyone involved. It really has come just in the nick of time.</p>
<p>“It&#8217;s been a huge battle, not just in terms of funding but with all the other issues we&#8217;ve had to sort out as well. For example work should have started in October but the ship carrying the rocks sank.</p>
<p>“I&#8217;m ecstatic that after all these years the defences are complete. The tower and other properties are now safe for the foreseeable future.”</p>
<p>The scheme has been praised at a national level and Andy Smith, Suffolk Coastal cabinet member for coastal management, was recently invited in front of the House of Commons Select Committee.</p>
<p>“It was a very proactive and innovative approach to the planning side and got the job done,” he said. “There can have been few other examples of such close effective and productive joint working between the community and the statutory bodies.</p>
<p>“At a national level it&#8217;s been recognised as quite significant. It&#8217;s being looked at quite seriously as a way of getting things done in the future.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Story by Criag Robinson in the <a href="http://www.eadt.co.uk/content/eadt/news/story.aspx?brand=EADOnline&amp;category=News&amp;tBrand=EADOnline&amp;tCategory=xDefault&amp;itemid=IPED26%20Jun%202009%2023%3A09%3A15%3A830" target="_blank">East Anglian Daily Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nvcc.org.uk/2009/06/eadt-new-sea-defences-to-protect-coastline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

